8 Comments

I had a heart attack (and had to be revived) after my second injection. It was not reported in a large part because I had a lot more on my mind and was just glad I made it. My doctors said it couldn’t be related. I was 50, vegetarian, active, no HBP, no high cholesterol

Expand full comment

The following breakdown from 2015 of who submits VAERS reports used to be available online in a FAQ which is itself no longer online. You can use this information when you get the typical pushback about how anyone can report to VAERS".

https://web.archive.org/web/20150615195821/http://vaers.hhs.gov/about/faqs

Who reports to VAERS?

- Vaccine manufacturers (37%)

- Health care providers (36%)

- State immunization programs (10%)

- Vaccine recipients (or their parent/guardians, 7%)

- Other sources (10%)

Here is another similar breakdown:

Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System plays vital role in safety

https://publications.aap.org/aapnews/news/14631

In 2012, reports were received from:

- Health care providers (41%)

- Manufacturers (29%)

- Other sources (17%)

- vaccinees or families (14%)

And if you want sources for underreporting:

This Harvard Pilgrim study should have been pivotal, the researchers discuss methods to streamline the submission of VAERS reports, but their results showed that actual VAERS reports are underreported very significantly. If the CDC was truly interested in vaccine safety and surveillance to find safety signals, they would have embraced this study, instead they ignored it, presumably because it would have increased "vaccine hesitancy".

Electronic Support for Public Health–Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (ESP:VAERS)

https://digital.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/docs/publication/r18hs017045-lazarus-final-report-2011.pdf

Of these doses, 35,570 possible reactions (2.6 percent of vaccinations) were identified. This is an average of 890 possible events, an average of 1.3 events per clinician, per month.

...fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events are reported.

Unfortunately, there was never an opportunity to perform system performance assessments because the necessary CDC contacts were no longer available and the CDC consultants responsible for receiving data were no longer responsive to our multiple requests to proceed with testing and evaluation.

Electronic Support for Public Health – Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (ESP:VAERS)

https://healthit.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/docs/publication/r18hs017045-lazarus-final-report-2011.pdf

https://digital.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/docs/publication/r18hs017045-lazarus-final-report-2011.pdf

"Adverse events from drugs and vaccines are common, but underreported. Although 25% of ambulatory patients experience an adverse drug event, less than 0.3% of all adverse drug events and 1-13% of serious events are reported to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Likewise, fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events are reported."

“A total of 1.4 million vaccine doses (of 45 different vaccines) were given to 376,452 individuals. Of these doses, 35,570 possible reactions (2.6 percent of vaccinations) were identified.” That corresponds to an adverse reaction per 39.4 vaccines (over 2.5%) and per 11 people who were vaccinated.

Kavid Kessler (former CDC Director): 1% serious events reported (drug reactions)

http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Safety/MedWatch/UCM201419.pdf

"Although the FDA receives many adverse event reports, these probably represent only a fraction of the serious adverse events encountered by providers. A recent review article found that between 3% and 11% of hospital admissions could be attributed to adverse drug reactions. Only about 1% of serious events are reported to the FDA, according to one study."

The Reporting Sensitivities of Two Passive Surveillance Systems for Vaccine Adverse Events

Steven Rosenthal,MD, MPH, and Robert Chen,MD, AM

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7503351

Spontaneous adverse drug reaction reporting vs event monitoring: a comparison.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1293280/

"The data suggests that under-reporting by the spontaneous system may be as high as 98% for several clinical events believed to be associated with drug treatment."

IOM Adverse Events Associated with Childhood Vaccines

http://www.nap.edu/catalog/2138/adverse-events-associated-with-childhood-vaccines-evidence-bearing-on-casuality

"...shortly after VAERS was established, a large vaccine manufacturer, Connaught Laboratories, estimated “about a 50-fold under-reporting of adverse events in the passive reporting system.”

50-fold underreporting of adverse events in the passive reporting system

http://www.vaccinationnews.org/sites/default/files/Scandals/Feb_22_02/Connaught%25Underreporting.pdf

https://www.vaccinationnews.org/Books/Adverse_Reactions/vaers/credible_estimates.htm

Reported adverse drug reactions in Iceland between 2013 and 2016. Comparison with reports from the Nordic countries

https://www.laeknabladid.is/tolublod/2017/0708/nr/6464

"Studies show that generally less than 10% of side effects are reported."

Expand full comment

I've observed more bad driving and more aggressive driving since the shots rolled out. I practice defensive driving all the time. Getting cut off in traffic seems to happen more often, like the other driver didn't see you at all or thinks you saw them so you should slam on brakes and let them make that turn right in front of you. Some don't stop at all at stop signs. And then there are the sudden medical emergencies experienced while driving. People dying behind the wheel before they crash their car. I wonder if auto insurers have seen an uptick in accidents.

Expand full comment

I am in Australia and the #sads deaths are happening almost daily. There is a prolific 🐘 in each and ever story I read and Obituary notice. I have lost count of the online funerals I am watching as I cannot attend all of them. I am 66 and proudly un 💉💉💉 from the toxic convid shots.

Expand full comment

Thankyou Megan

Expand full comment
Jun 12Liked by Megan Redshaw

This is soooo undercounted! Multiply every item the CDC has counted by at least 50!

Expand full comment

Lemme get this straight. The CDC pushed the fatal mRNA poison injections like candy trying to force every American to get them, and is still recommending injection number nine or is it ten 3 1/2 years later. Now we are supposed to believe any data the CDC provides about the death and destruction it has caused by promoting this deadly garbage? This is the same crappola that will never get resolved like asking who shot Kennedy. Ongoing forever and a day...and NEVER to be trusted.

Expand full comment

Yep. You're exactly right.

Expand full comment